- Consumer skepticism is growing as grocery bills, housing costs, and everyday expenses remain elevated despite political promises
- Deflation is extremely rare in modern economies and would signal economic crisis, not prosperity
- What actually happens is that inflation slows (disinflation), but prices stabilize at their new, higher levels
- Wage growth matters more than price reductions—real purchasing power depends on income rising faster than prices
- Structural changes in the economy, from supply chains to labor markets, make a return to 2019 prices unrealistic.
The Expectations Gap
During the 2024 campaign season, many Americans heard promises to reduce the cost of living. Now, as grocery receipts still shock and rent checks still sting, consumers are facing a harsh reality: the prices they remember from 2019 aren’t coming back.
This disconnect between political rhetoric and economic reality is creating a credibility crisis. When someone promises lower prices but your weekly shopping trip still costs $150 instead of the $100 you remember from five years ago, trust erodes quickly. The problem isn’t just political—it’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how inflation actually works.
Understanding the Inflation Ratchet
Here’s the uncomfortable truth that economists understand but rarely communicate clearly: in modern economies, prices seldom decline across the board. What we call “fighting inflation” doesn’t mean reversing price increases. It means slowing the rate at which prices rise.
Think of it like a ratchet wrench. Prices click upward with each turn of inflation. When we “beat inflation,” we’re not turning the wrench backward—we’re just stopping it from clicking forward as quickly. The grocery bill, which increased from $100 to $150, doesn’t return to $100. If we’re successful, it might stay at $150 instead of climbing to $175.
Actual deflation—a sustained decrease in the overall price level—is vanishingly rare in developed economies. The last time the United States experienced meaningful deflation was during the Great Depression. Japan’s deflationary period in the 1990s and 2000s is held up as a cautionary tale, not a model to emulate. Deflation typically signals economic catastrophe: collapsing demand, rising unemployment, and a downward spiral that’s extraordinarily difficult to escape.
Why Prices Stay High
Several structural factors explain why the inflation of 2021-2023 has created a new price floor rather than a temporary spike.
Labor market transformation: The pandemic fundamentally altered worker expectations and bargaining power. Many workers who left specific industries aren’t coming back, and those who remain have negotiated higher wages. Businesses facing genuine labor shortages can’t simply cut salaries back to 2019 levels without losing their workforce entirely. Those labor costs are baked into prices.
Supply chain restructuring: Companies spent years and billions of dollars reorganizing supply chains for resilience rather than pure efficiency. Diversifying suppliers, holding more inventory, and reshoring some production all entail costs—costs that are passed along to consumers and won’t disappear even as supply chain crises fade.
Housing market dynamics: Housing costs surged due to a genuine shortage of units, not just speculation. Construction costs rose, interest rates increased, borrowing costs increased, and the shortage persists. Landlords who refinanced or purchased properties at higher prices cannot reduce rents without incurring losses. Home prices don’t typically fall significantly without a recession and crisis in the housing market itself.
Sticky prices downward: Basic business psychology works against price cuts. Once consumers accept a new price point, businesses have little incentive to lower prices voluntarily. Why would a restaurant drop its burger price from $16 back to $12 if customers are still buying at $16? Competitive pressure can help, but it’s a slow force.
What Actually Helps Consumers
If prices won’t come down, what does matter? The answer is wage growth and productivity improvements that outpace inflation.
Consider this scenario: If your grocery bill went from $100 to $150 (a 50% increase) but your salary went from $50,000 to $80,000, you’re actually better off in real terms, even though the sticker prices are higher. This is why economists focus on “real wages”—wages adjusted for inflation.
The positive development in the current situation is that wage growth has been strong, particularly for lower-income workers. The tight labor market of recent years forced employers to raise wages significantly. While inflation eroded some of those gains, many workers—especially those in service industries, hospitality, and retail—are earning meaningfully more than they were five years ago.
The challenge is that wage gains feel less tangible than price increases. A 5% raise spread over a year feels abstract. A $2 increase in the price of your favorite sandwich is immediate and salient.
The Political Communication Problem
This creates an almost impossible political situation. Promising to “bring down prices” sounds appealing and intuitive. Explaining that “we’ll ensure wage growth outpaces inflation while maintaining price stability” sounds like economist jargon.
Yet the latter is what’s actually achievable and desirable. The former is either dishonest or reflects a misunderstanding of economics so profound that it should disqualify someone from managing economic policy.
Consumers’ skepticism about price promises isn’t cynicism—it’s pattern recognition. They’ve been hearing these promises while watching their costs remain elevated. This gap between rhetoric and reality doesn’t just undermine trust in individual politicians; it erodes faith in institutions’ ability to manage the economy at all.
Looking Forward
The path forward isn’t about reversing inflation—it’s about managing the transition to this new price environment while ensuring incomes keep pace. This means focusing on:
- Productivity improvements that allow businesses to maintain margins without further price increases
- Competition policy that prevents price gouging and keeps markets competitive
- Wage growth support through tight labor markets and worker bargaining power
- Targeted relief for the most vulnerable consumers struggling with necessities
- Honest communication about what’s possible versus what’s politically convenient
Consumers deserve leaders who level with them about economic realities, even when those realities are disappointing. The 2019 price level is gone. The question is whether incomes in 2025 and beyond can maintain or improve living standards despite higher nominal prices.
The answer to that question depends on policies that boost productivity, maintain competitive markets, support wage growth, and target help where it’s needed most—not on magical promises to turn back the clock on prices.
Consumer skepticism about inflation promises isn’t a communication problem to be solved with better messaging. It’s a reality problem that requires honest acknowledgment. Prices aren’t coming down. The grocery bill that shocks you today will likely be roughly the same next year, which, in the context of slowing inflation, actually represents success.
The real question isn’t whether prices will return to 2019 levels. The question is whether 2025 wages can provide 2019 living standards or better. That’s the promise politicians should be making—and the one they should be held accountable for keeping.
Discover more from New Media and Marketing
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

