Walk into a decent bicycle shop these days and something just feels off. Gorgeous bikes are everywhere. Gorgeous carbon frames. Electronic shifting. Integrated cockpits. Wireless…everything. Then you see the price tag. $6,000. $8,000. $10,000. Occasionally well over $12,000. If you’re an enthusiast who’s been riding for 20 years, maybe prices have become strangely normalized to you. But what about that 35-year-old recreational cyclist who just wants a really nice road bike or gravel bike? At some point, he or she is going to ask why. Why are bikes so expensive? And less and less will they ask “why are bikes so expensive?” and more will they ask: why should I pay that much when I could probably get someone else to sell me most of that technology for thousands less? That second question should scare the established bicycle industry. Because Chinese companies are no longer content selling bikes for Western brands. They want to be the brands. And some of the biggest names in cycling may be aiding and abetting that goal.
First, the numbers aren’t pretty
The US industry was trying to recover from one of the most epic peaks and valleys in its history. PeopleForBikes estimates the U. S. bike market at about $6.6 billion in 2024. That is 8% lower than the year before.
Retailers have struggled with excess inventory, discounting and consolidation. US imports tell a similar story. Americans imported just 8.54 million traditional bikes in 20 25—a decline of 21% from 2024 and the lowest number of imports in at least ten years. Value fell below $1 billion for the first time since 2006. Things improved slightly in the first half of 2026.
The U.S. imported 7% more conventional bikes than during the first half of 2025. The dollar value of those imports only grew by 1%. America was on pace to import less than nine million conventional bikes for the second straight year. The bike industry is not thriving. It is stabilizing. And finding its new normal. PeopleForBikes CEO Jenn Dice says it could take years to adjust. In 2025, PeopleForBikes started forecasting flat domestic bicycle sales through 2029.
COVID convinced the industry that the future had arrived
Nobody faults them for making the mistake originally. Bikes became unavailable at brick-and-mortar retailers during the pandemic. Outside activity was in demand. Gyms shut down. Families rode bikes together. Supply chains everywhere were disrupted.
Bike dealers struggled to keep inventory in stock. Manufacturers overreacted as sensible businessmen do. They adjusted production levels way up. They didn’t quite stop there, either. They adjusted them way up some more. Then they adjusted them up again. Customers, however, aren’t riding like it’s 20twenty. Supply is hitting shelves just as insane demand is tapering off. Now manufacturers and retailers are stuck with warehouses full of pricey bikes. The (also predictable) result? Discounting. And now we have another problem. If you discover that a $6k bike is going to be $4.5k next month, you learn a lesson: Don’t buy a bike for full price. Instead, wait for the sale. That mindset is very hard to correct.
Trek illustrates how painful the hangover has become
Look at Trek. Earlier this year, Escape Collective published a report from inside Trek detailing layoffs, excess inventory and the cost of carrying that inventory. The anonymous former Trek managerial employee recounted approximately 18 months where “daily sales comps have rolled last year’s sales below.” Trek is far from alone.
Every brand had to absorb inventory meant for a market that vanished. Herein lies the irony. The industry’s knee-jerk reaction to depressed demand is often to raise prices on the remaining customers. Some of that price hike is unavoidable due to tariffs. Trek informed dealers on April 20, 2025, that prices are increasing on most models due to rising tariffs. Specialized, however, created a separate 10% tariff add-on fee for certain products and changed pricing on others. Completely understandable from an economics standpoint. Except customers don’t purchase bikes based on how manufacturers structure their costs. They purchase based on the value they think they are getting. And that’s where things can get really bad.
The $10,000 bicycle has created its own competitor
Western bicycle companies operated under a fantastic business model for decades. Design and engineer bikes. Build your brand equity. Sponsor pros. Outsource most of your manufacturing to Asia. Sell to distributors and bike shops. Take all of the value added by having a premium brand. Just one problem. Asian manufacturers were learning.
While everyone else outsourced manufacturing to Asia, the Asians learned carbon layup. They learned aerodynamics. They learned tooling. They learned quality control. They learned wheel manufacture. They learned to make components. And then, one day somebody was going to say, “Why are we manufacturing a $10,000 bike for somebody else when we could be selling a $5,000 bike ourselves?” Today is that day. As Cyclingnews has reported, Chinese OEM manufacturers who once exclusively made frames and components for North American companies are starting to develop consumer-facing brands. That is a massively disruptive potential change to the industry. China isn’t competing in the bike industry. China is the bike industry.
The value gap is getting difficult to ignore
Look at companies such as Winspace. Winspace says it now distributes through more than 200 stores worldwide while also selling directly to consumers. Its bicycles and wheels have competed at UCI Continental level and even at the Olympics. Or look at XDS.
Its new X-LAB initiative is explicitly attacking the premium Western market with carbon road, gravel and electric bikes. XDS claims vertical integration allows its bikes to be priced roughly $1,500–$3,000 below competing products. That figure comes from XDS itself and should therefore be treated as a marketing claim, but the strategy is unmistakable.
Its first U.S. market gravel bike was priced at around $3,200. Okay, now put yourself in the customer’s position. You are looking at two carbon bikes. One is $7,000. One is $3,500. Maybe the pricier bike has better dealer support. Maybe its engineering is superior. Maybe its warranty is better. Maybe it will retain its value better. Maybe the manufacturer has higher standards for its carbon manufacturing and testing. All of those are valid points. But now the incumbent brand must justify to the customer that those advantages are worth $3,500 more. A logo alone won’t do it.
Direct-to-consumer is changing the economics
This might be the area of the market that traditional bike companies most overlooked. PeopleForBikes recently uncovered a surprise when looking into the e-bike industry. Using traditional retail metrics, we had been failing to account for about 450,000 direct-to-consumer e-bikes valued at approximately
Discover more from New Media and Marketing
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
